...

Clothes — A Daily Thread – Post 2

The fact is, you don’t need new clothes in most cases. I mean, until fairly recent history most people only had a couple of outfits — one for daily wear and one for church. If one got a rip or hole, one repaired it. If something became too damaged to wear, only then would it be replaced. Likely with the same thing (the pair of jeans on wore in the field would be replaced by another pair of the exact same jean which would be the only ones they carried at the general store and were made to order).

Obviously, this would not work for most today. But I point this out only to say that fashion and the idea of having multiple items of various pieces of clothing is a fairly recent idea history wise and it can be a useful reminder in taming our own desire for more and directing our attention from want to need.

The interesting/good thing is that there are many modern manufacturers who either recognize their own environmental impact and wish to make sure their values are properly aligned with their business (i.e. Patagonia) or see the growing interest in re-use/re-sell as an opportunity to be exploited for profit (i.e. Levi’s, probably). Smaller indie brands are getting into this game too (See: Ministry of Supply). Even fast and fast-ish fashion brands like J.Crew are dipping their feet into the archive/re-sell game.

Regardless of motivation, there are an increasing number of ways one can get used gear directly from the producers one might otherwise buy new from. And if for some reason you do need a new pair of jeans or tech-bro fleece vest, it is at least worth a check to see if you can get something gently used versus new.

Clothes — A Daily Thread – Post 1

I’m going to start a new thing here on the old blog I’m calling “A Daily Thread”. Sometimes, my mind gets thinking deeply enough on a topic to warrant a series of posts on it, versus trying to stuff all of those things into a single post. I was thinking about how to best group such things together. Therefore, I’ve created a new category for these titled “thread”. That way, if you just want to see all of the posts grouped in this way, one can.

Not sure this is the right solution but let’s roll with it for now…

To start with, I’ll be making a few posts on a topic that’s been on my mind lately and that’s clothes. I tend to dwell on clothes a lot at this time of year. Something with the change of seasons. I begin to think a lot about what I have, what I need, what should be in my wardrobe closet and what should be in storage, etc.

One of my new year’s intentions for the past two years has been “No new clothes”. This is for many reasons… The minimalist in me knows I really don’t need much and have everything I do need. Clothes are a huge environmental issue. There are plenty of good ways to buy gently used clothing — even these days from the companies that produce/sell new (more on this at later time and other post). So, there really is no good reason I shouldn’t be able to stick to my intention.

That said, I have for the most part failed at this. For any number of reasons. Not the least of which is my own inability to resist the occasional purchase, especially when I can find a pretty good reason I may need it.

For instance, I’ve lost about 20 pounds in the last few months. Therefore, most of the jeans, chinos, and trousers in my closet were, quite literally, falling off of me. So, I did have a good reason to buy a new pair of jeans (on sale) and a new pair of chinos (at Costco) to actually have one of each that fit my new waist size.

My plan was to then pack away all of the jeans/trousers that no longer fit as part of my bi-annual wardrobe switch out of my spring/summer clothes to my fall/winter ones. In doing so, when I opened the box I store jeans that no longer fit, I discovered several pair within that, at the time I packed them, were too small for me. Now, three of those pair fit me just fine. So, I could have shopped my own closet all along and stayed true to my intention.

So, I learned a valuable lesson here… Shop myself first. I must force myself to remember to regularly look at what I already might have to meet my needs. The truth is, I likely have it already and, if I don’t, could still likely find/buy it without buying new.

For those that care, posting to The Cramped has ticked up again in the past couple of days. Assuming you don’t already have it in your RSS, consider checking it out.

It’s low frequency and goes in spurts.

Uniqlo is actually good? – cliophate.wtf

I’ve always thought Uniqlo was one of these fast fashion brands, like H&M or Zara, that produces mostly okay clothing. But apparently, they use Japanese craftsmanship mixed with cheaper materials leading to quality pieces at decent prices. Huh, who knew?

Agreed. The embedded video is very enlightening. I have purchased all of my undergarments at Uniqlo (their AIRism line). I’ve found them to be fantastic as far as longevity, comfort, and value. Especially great for travel.

Berkshire Hathaway hit $1 trillion market value, making it the first US non-tech company to achieve the milestone | CNN Business

“Berkshire should do a bit better than the average American corporation and, more important, should also operate with materially less risk of permanent loss of capital,” he wrote. “Anything beyond ‘slightly better,’ though, is wishful thinking.”

However, since his February 24 letter was published, shares of the company are up more than 13%, and year-to-date they’re up a whopping 28%.

Amazing.

The Bookshelf Tells All – by David Coggins

A good bookshelf should be full. Or nearly full anyway. An empty bookshelf has so much more to offer the world. It sits like an empty closet, an empty museum, an empty stadium, unfulfilled, not reaching its potential. Trust our strength, the bookshelf begs us, let us show off, baby!

Love this whole thing.

It’s Not Just Shein: Why Are ALL Your Clothes Worse Now? – YouTube

“I want you to think about how many new pieces of clothing you bought last year. If you’re anything like the average American, it was around 68. In 1980 that number was 12. But wait, it gets crazier. In the ’80s, Americans spent about 7% of their annual income on clothes. Today, it’s just 3%. We spend half as much, even though we’re buying five times more.”

I found this video enlightening.

Stock and flow / Snarkmarket

Flow is the feed. It’s the posts and the tweets. It’s the stream of daily and sub-daily updates that reminds people you exist.

Stock is the durable stuff. It’s the content you produce that’s as interesting in two months (or two years) as it is today. It’s what people discover via search. It’s what spreads slowly but surely, building fans over time.

An oldie but a goodie and something I’m thinking about again. Worth consideration.