I was not quite sure of this article when it first came out. I was not sure what bothered me so much about it. Perhaps it was the clearly sensationalist headline paired with copy that otherwise was well tread before. Perhaps it was the fact that its opening salvo in support of the headline is dashed and dispelled by the end. Still not sure I see the point or why it matters.
So why am I linking it? Because it is the schizophrenia of the piece that made it interesting enough for me to keep going back to read it over the past year.